“The law of unintended consequences pushes us ceaselessly through the years, permitting no pause for perspective.” (Richard Schickel)
A few years back I had an opportunity to take a sky diving trip to Australia with some friends. It was a good group of guys and I would be doing two things I'd never done before; visiting Down Under and jumping out of a plane. It was a frightening proposition but I was eager to push out of my comfort zone.
On the eve of the trip one of my daughters got into trouble at school. She was caught up in some sixth grade drama and made some problematic moves as she tried to figure out her place in the social pecking order.
The school dealt with it appropriately and she seemed to understand the boundaries she was crossing. Still, it was the first significant disciplinary issue I had dealt with as a parent. To compound things, I made some assumptions around my exposure as both the dad of a kid breaking rules and as a faculty member at a high profile international school. It's a social fish bowl and I figured I would be scrutinized as a parent/educator in this community.
It turns out, there was a bit of scrutiny from at least one parent but the biggest judgment came from within. I had, for so many years as a teacher and parent, made (incomplete) conclusions of the more challenging kids in my classes. Really, I was judgmental and, apples and trees being what they are, I couldn't stand what my daughter's actions might be conveying about me and my parenting. A tighter parental sphincter I had never known...
So, of course, I tried to nip this in the bud and minimize the damage. I imparted my wisdom (calmly, at first, not in the end) to my misguided Red Delicious. I figured she'd be humble and apologetic about what she had done - No need to worry, though, as I knew exactly how to fix her. So, I carried on with my "whys, hows, whats, wheres, whos and whens". Man, I really believed I was doing a great father-knows-best job. After all, I know kids!
I even cancelled my trip to Australia in order to be there to pick up the pieces/provide stability in order to keep her from making more mistakes.
So, what was the takeaway?
1. A wife that felt that I didn't trust her to manage things while I was away.
2. A daughter that, to this day, doesn't trust me completely and won't share much with me as a result.
Total Fail.
I recently had a colleague remind me of the Law of Unintended Consequences. Good stuff. If you are perfect, then don't bother reading the link. But, if you're like me, human, then you might find it interesting. Furthermore, it can inform your process as a parent of adolescents. Replace "economist" with "parent" in the following quote by Bastiat and you'll see what I mean.
"There is only one difference between a bad economist and a good one: the bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effect that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen."
Mother-scratcher!!! You mean in order to be a good parent I have to be able to predict the future?
Accurately?
No. After all, you're not an economist. Economists are required to make informed predictions in order to prevent financial meltdowns...
Our challenge as parents is to shed our own fears, hopes, dreams, expectations and dirty little secrets in order to accept and trust our children...
...even when we don't understand why they're behaving the way they are...
…Way harder than predicting the future!
More Unintended Consequences:
I am fast becoming a fan of Arizona State University President, Michael Crow. Admittedly, I have only read one other article by Crow, but they both resonated immediately. The most recent article was, perhaps, a bit more political *.
* LISTEN UP: It's important to note that, while I have lots and lots of opinions and experiences to draw upon, none of them involve party lines.
Florida Governor, Rick Scott:
“We don’t need a lot more anthropologists in the state. … I want to spend our dollars giving people science, technology, engineering, and math degrees. That’s what our kids need to focus all their time and attention on, those types of degrees, so when they get out of school, they can get a job.”
Michael Crow's response:
"The governor is correct in one regard: The imperative to advance STEM education cannot be overstated. Given the importance of scientific discovery and technological innovation to our national competitiveness, we should focus on increasing the quantitative, scientific, and technological literacy of all of our students. But resolving the complex challenges that confront our nation and the world requires more than expertise in science and technology. We must also educate individuals capable of meaningful civic participation, creative expression, and communicating insights across borders. The potential for graduates in any field to achieve professional success and to contribute significantly to our economy depends on an education that entails more than calculus."
I thought my daughter needed a specific response to her actions. The school had already done that. But I, desperate and scared, attacked. Laser precision describes my step-by-step interrogation of her misdeeds and moreover, I probed her for the "why".
Read the article by Crow. It's a little "pedagogical" but I think he does a good job of explaining why he believes university emphasis on STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) is not enough to bring about economic growth in Florida (or anywhere else for that matter).
STEM Education = Jobs = Economic Growth (Scott)
STEM Education + Liberal Arts Education (the ability to understand the complexity and interrelatedness of our cultural, economic, natural, political, social, and technological systems) = the mental agility to establish new business enterprises, scientific or technological capabilities, social initiatives, and creative endeavors in every sector of the economy = stronger, more vibrant economy (Crow).
The tie in here, of course, is the Law of Unintended Consequences that Crow believes to inherently flaw Governor Scott's idea around STEM. It's quite possible that the STEM-dominant push garners Scott lots of support and, perhaps, votes.
Hey, I thought I was doing the right thing to jump all over my daughter. I intended to stop poor choices by employing very specific strategies and interventions (namely: long, heated and unconvincing lectures). I graced her with what I thought to be very effective words of wisdom. Unfortunately, I failed to pay attention to the bigger picture. I didn't pull back and apply all that I knew about this particular child. I reacted to the behavior and not her. I made things worse by reacting in an emotional manner. It was a pivotal moment for me as a parent and I whiffed.
I'm not saying that my approach was completely wrong. I just didn't take into consideration the whole child.
Her own hopes, fears and expectations were ignored by me and replaced with my own.
At the end of the day, I did my best at the time. It is unfortunate, however, that I didn't allow for a broader understanding of her perspective. I recognize my missed opportunity to help her through a rough spot developmentally. I'm sure she's had quite a few since then that never made it to me because she couldn't trust me to listen and not act in judgment. She owns the sour moods and overt glares - after all, she is a teenager! But these dark clouds could instead be signals for opportunities to help her through an issue. It's my job now to find the patience and understanding for as long as it takes for her to figure out that I’m available and willing to listen. Incidentally, her sister went through some of this as well. Different kids, different circumstances and different results. Another lesson learned; one size does not fit all. But that's for another post.
So, I thought I had it all figured out. I believed that I understood the behavior and responded directly...
...But, I became an adversary instead of an ally.
And, Governor Scott believes that STEM degrees lead to jobs...
...But "if we were to restrict opportunities for higher education only to the set of degrees associated with science, technology, engineering, and math, we would in fact oversupply the workforce with capacity in technological transformation and undersupply the knowledge-based economy with the broader set of skills necessary for high-speed, creativity-driven innovation."(Crow)
It’s a bit ironic that I skipped a comfort zone-challenging opportunity to instead apply firm control over another. But, I am fortunate to have learned a lesson around perspective, albeit a tough lesson. Perhaps I now have the ability to pause for perspective when dealing with my daughter. It'll be interesting as she is turning out to be as independent (read: stubborn) as I am. Then again, maybe it’s time to stop trying to figure it out and go sky-diving instead.